August 15, 2022

Best Health Ideas

Every Health & Fitness Helps

A population-based cohort study of 46 million adults in England


Methods and findings

In this whole-population cohort study, we analysed linked electronic health records from adults living in England, from 8 December 2020 to 18 March 2021. We estimated incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for major arterial, venous, and thrombocytopenic outcomes 1 to 28 and >28 days after first vaccination dose for ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 vaccines. Analyses were performed separately for ages <70 and ≥70 years and adjusted for age, age2, sex, ethnicity, and deprivation. We also prespecified adjustment for anticoagulant medication, combined oral contraceptive medication, hormone replacement therapy medication, history of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis, and history of coronavirus infection in analyses of venous thrombosis; and diabetes, hypertension, smoking, antiplatelet medication, blood pressure lowering medication, lipid lowering medication, anticoagulant medication, history of stroke, and history of myocardial infarction in analyses of arterial thromboses. We selected further covariates with backward selection.

Of 46 million adults, 23 million (51%) were women; 39 million (84%) were <70; and 3.7 million (8.1%) Asian or Asian British, 1.6 million (3.5%) Black or Black British, 36 million (79%) White, 0.7 million (1.5%) mixed ethnicity, and 1.5 million (3.2%) were of another ethnicity. Approximately 21 million (46%) adults had their first vaccination between 8 December 2020 and 18 March 2021.

The crude incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) of all venous events were as follows: prevaccination, 140 [95% confidence interval (CI): 138 to 142]; ≤28 days post-ChAdOx1-S, 294 (281 to 307); >28 days post-ChAdOx1-S, 359 (338 to 382), ≤28 days post-BNT162b2-S, 241 (229 to 253); >28 days post-BNT162b2-S 277 (263 to 291). The crude incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) of all arterial events were as follows: prevaccination, 546 (95% CI: 541 to 555); ≤28 days post-ChAdOx1-S, 1,211 (1,185 to 1,237); >28 days post-ChAdOx1-S, 1678 (1,630 to 1,726), ≤28 days post-BNT162b2-S, 1,242 (1,214 to 1,269); >28 days post-BNT162b2-S, 1,539 (1,507 to 1,572).

Adjusted HRs (aHRs) 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S, compared with unvaccinated rates, at ages <70 and ≥70 years, respectively, were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.05) and 0.58 (0.53 to 0.63) for venous thromboses, and 0.90 (0.86 to 0.95) and 0.76 (0.73 to 0.79) for arterial thromboses. Corresponding aHRs for BNT162b2 were 0.81 (0.74 to 0.88) and 0.57 (0.53 to 0.62) for venous thromboses, and 0.94 (0.90 to 0.99) and 0.72 (0.70 to 0.75) for arterial thromboses. aHRs for thrombotic events were higher at younger ages for venous thromboses after ChAdOx1-S, and for arterial thromboses after both vaccines.

Rates of intracranial venous thrombosis (ICVT) and of thrombocytopenia in adults aged <70 years were higher 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S (aHRs 2.27, 95% CI: 1.33 to 3.88 and 1.71, 1.35 to 2.16, respectively), but not after BNT162b2 (0.59, 0.24 to 1.45 and 1.00, 0.75 to 1.34) compared with unvaccinated. The corresponding absolute excess risks of ICVT 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S were 0.9 to 3 per million, varying by age and sex.

The main limitations of the study are as follows: (i) it relies on the accuracy of coded healthcare data to identify exposures, covariates, and outcomes; (ii) the use of primary reason for hospital admission to measure outcome, which improves the positive predictive value but may lead to an underestimation of incidence; and (iii) potential unmeasured confounding.

Author summary


In late February 2021, several groups reported a rare syndrome of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after vaccination against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with ChAdOx1-S (developed by Oxford-AstraZeneca) [13]. Thromboses were found in unusual sites such as the cerebral venous sinuses, or mesenteric or portal veins. This syndrome, named “vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia” (VITT), is probably due to an autoimmune response to platelet factor 4 (PF4) in the absence of exposure to heparin [1]. Whether the risk of common thrombotic illnesses is also increased postvaccination is uncertain, although there have been reports of postvaccination ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage [1,3,4].

Estimates of vaccine-associated excess risk based on case reports and routine reporting may be biased if diagnostic thresholds vary between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals or there is less than population-wide coverage. In England, the National Health Service (NHS) provides almost all healthcare; therefore, linked healthcare records provide comprehensive, population-wide data on outcomes before and after vaccination [5]. Vaccination in England began on 8 December 2020: The first groups vaccinated were care home residents, then those aged ≥80 years and frontline health and social care workers. Those clinically extremely vulnerable were invited alongside people aged ≥70 years, and those with other comorbidities aged <65 alongside people aged >65 years. Consequently, individuals vaccinated earlier are expected to have higher rates of venous and arterial events.

We conducted a new cohort study using routinely collected, linked health data from multiple sources, covering almost the entire English adult population (>46 million). We estimated associations of ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 with major venous and arterial events and thrombocytopenic haematological outcomes from the start of the vaccination programme to mid-March 2021, before VITT surveillance was widespread.


Data were analysed according to a prespecified protocol and analysis plan that was published on GitHub on 5 May 2021 (S1 Protocol) [6]. We used the Strengthening the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected Data (RECORD) guideline to write this paper (S1 Record Checklist).


The study population was adults (aged ≥18 years), alive and registered with an English NHS general practice on 8 December 2020. The data resource [5] includes primary care data (General Practice Extraction Service (GPES) Data for Pandemic Planning and Research (GDPPR)) from 98% of general practices linked at individual-level to nationwide secondary care data including all NHS hospital admissions (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Secondary Uses Service (SUS) data from 1997 onwards), COVID-19 laboratory testing data, COVID-19 vaccination data (NHS England Immunisation Management System), national community drug dispensing data (NHS BSA Dispensed Medicines from 2018), and death registrations. We accessed and analysed pseudonymised data within NHS Digital’s secure, privacy-protecting Trusted Research Environment [7].


We defined covariates from primary care, hospital admissions, community drug dispensing, and COVID-19 laboratory testing data, using phenotyping algorithms verified by specialist physicians (see study protocol). Phenotypes for comorbidities, risk factors, and other covariates used Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) concepts for primary care data, and ICD-10 codes for hospital admission data. We defined sex, age, region, deprivation, and smoking status as the latest recorded in primary care records before 8 December 2020, and the most recently recorded ethnicity in either primary care or hospital admissions records was used. We defined history of diabetes, depression, obesity, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), cancer, thrombophilia, liver disease, or dementia as any record in primary care and/or hospital admission data before 8 December 2020. We derived the number of unique diseases in SNOMED-CT for the year before 8 December 2020 from primary care records and major surgery in the previous year from hospital admission records (using the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys classification of surgical procedures).

We defined a history of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection as either a positive COVID-19 antigen test in national laboratory data covering swab tests performed in the general population and hospitals or a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis in primary care or hospital admission records. We defined prior medication using community dispensing data on all prescriptions dispensed by community pharmacists, appliance contractors, and doctors in England. British National Formulary (BNF) codes were used to define the total number of types of medication prescribed and dispensed in the following groups: antiplatelets, antihypertensives, lipid lowering agents, oral anticoagulants, combined oral contraceptives, and hormone replacement therapy.


We derived outcomes from primary care data, hospital admission data (SUS dataset), and the national death registry (see S1 Protocol) [8]. We used specialist clinician-verified SNOMED-CT and ICD-10 rule-based phenotyping algorithms to define fatal or nonfatal (i) arterial thrombotic events: MI, ischaemic stroke (ischaemic or unclassified stroke, spinal stroke, or retinal infarction), other nonstroke non-MI arterial thromboembolism; (ii) venous thromboembolic events: PE, lower limb DVT, intracranial venous thrombosis (ICVT), portal vein thrombosis, and venous thrombosis at other sites; (iii) thrombocytopenic haematological events: any thrombocytopenia (idiopathic, primary, secondary, or unspecified), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP); (iv) death from any cause; (v) other vascular outcomes: haemorrhagic stroke (intracerebral or subarachnoid) and mesenteric thrombus for which available codes did not distinguish between arterial or venous causes; and (vi) lower limb fracture as a control condition unlikely to be affected by vaccination. The event date was the earliest of start of hospital episode, death, or recorded date of primary care event or consultation. We identified events within the death registry based on underlying cause of death and in hospital admission data based on the primary cause of the care episode.

Statistical analyses

Follow-up was from 8 December 2020 to 18 March 2021, the date the European Medicine Agency (EMA) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) discussed the first reported complications of vaccination, after which diagnostic effort was expected to be concentrated in people receiving ChAdOx1-S [9]. Any cell numbers <5 and any potentially disclosive numbers <10 are not reported exactly but as <5 and <10, respectively.

To allow for varying vaccination dates, we split follow-up from 8 December 2020 for each person into periods before, and 1 to 28, and >28 days after, first vaccination. Censoring was at the earliest of the outcome, death, 18 March 2021 and, in analyses of specific vaccines, receipt of the other vaccine. We estimated incidence rates per 100,000 people per year for each outcome, before and 1 to 28 and >28 days after vaccination.

We fitted Cox models with time zero 8 December 2020, ensuring that all analyses accounted for changes in rates of outcome events with calendar time. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the periods 1 to 28 and >28 days after vaccination with unvaccinated or prevaccination person-time (reference). We fitted Cox models separately by age group (<70 and ≥70 years), both overall and separately for males and females. All Cox models were stratified by geographic region. For rare outcomes, sex-specific HRs were estimated from vaccine–sex interaction terms. For computational efficiency, each fitted model used data from all individuals with the outcome of interest and a random 10% sample of all other individuals; analyses incorporated inverse probability weights to account for this sampling [10,11]. We derived confidence intervals with robust standard errors.

Region-; age-sex-region-; and fully adjusted HRs (aHRs) for associations of ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 with outcome events were estimated. Analyses were adjusted for age, age2, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, and relevant medical history. Further covariates were selected using backward selection, from models using MI as the outcome. Covariates had few missing values (apart from ethnicity, for which the 5.9% “missing” were included as a separate category); hence, all analyses used “complete-cases”.

Sensitivity analyses examined outcome events recorded as the primary or secondary reason for admission or death in hospital admissions or death records; fatal outcome events (those followed by death from any cause within 28 days); and all venous and all arterial thrombotic outcome events associated with thrombocytopenia. Effect modification by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, medication, and medical history was examined for all venous and all arterial thromboses.

We calculated age- and sex-specific absolute excess risks of ICVT in days 1 to 28 following vaccination by multiplying estimated HRs by the average monthly incidence rates of first fatal or nonfatal ICVT; the latter were derived from records during calendar year 2019 in the population-wide data resource.

The study was approved by the Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee (20/NE/0161), the NHS Digital Data Access Request Service (DARS-NIC-381078-Y9C5K), and the British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre CVD-COVID-UK Approvals and Oversight Board.

Information on the data used can be found on the HDR UK Gateway; EHR phenotyping algorithms can be downloaded in machine-readable formats from the HDR UK Phenotype Library Data manipulation and analyses used SQL and Python in Databricks and RStudio (Professional) Version 1.3.1093.1 driven by R Version 4.0.3. All code and phenotypes are available at


On 8 December 2020, 46,162,942 eligible adults were registered with an English general practice. By 18 March 2021, 21,193,814 (46%) had received their first vaccination (8,712,477 BNT162b2; 12,481,337 ChAdOx1-S) (S1 Fig). Postvaccination person-years of follow-up for ages <40, 40 to 69, and ≥70 years, respectively, were for ChAdOx1-S: 96,745, 455,122, and 418,942 person-years; for BNT162b2: 165,815, 466,025, and 603,436 person-years. Total unvaccinated follow-up time for ages <40, 40 to 69, and ≥70 years was 4,529,022, 5,026,046, and 1,008,498 person-years, respectively. The median follow-up per person was 101 days.

The risks per 100,000 persons from 8 December 2020 to 18 March 2021 were for the following: any venous thrombosis 45.3; any arterial thrombosis 189; thrombocytopenia 4.2 (Table 1, age-stratified estimates S1 Table). Risks of venous and arterial thromboses were higher in people with comorbidities and with increasing age and deprivation, and varied substantially by ethnicity. Absolute and relative increases in risk with increasing age and deprivation were greater for arterial than for venous thromboses. The risk per 100,000 people during follow-up of venous thromboses was higher in people with prior DVT or PE (541), thrombophilia (327), or oral anticoagulant medication (170), while the risk of arterial thromboses was higher in people with prior stroke (2,955), MI (2,036), or antiplatelet medication (1,451). The risk of thrombocytopenia increased with age and comorbidities but varied less markedly with ethnicity and deprivation than the risk of venous or arterial thromboses.

The additional confounding factors selected using backward selection were as follows: for both sexes and age strata, previous diagnosis of cancer, number of unique diseases in the last year, surgery in the last year, obesity, liver disease; additionally for women aged <70, history of depression, and total number of types of medication (by BNF chapters); additionally for men aged <70, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and thrombocytopenia; and additionally for men and women aged ≥70, chronic kidney disease, and dementia.

The crude incidence rates of all events varied substantially in unvaccinated and postvaccination (Tables 2 and 3 age-stratified estimates S1 Table), and the crude HRs comparing incidence rates after with before vaccination were substantially attenuated after adjusting for age and further attenuated after adjusting for confounding factors. For example, in <70-year-olds, the HRs 1 to 28 days after vaccination with ChAdOx1-S versus unvaccinated were attenuated from 2.81 (unadjusted) to 2.27 (adjusted) for ICVT; from 4.85 to 1.71 for thrombocytopenia; and from 3.21 to 0.90 for ischaemic stroke (Tables 4 and 5).

In people aged <70 years, the fully adjusted HR for any venous thrombosis was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90 to 1.05) 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S compared with before vaccination, with similar aHRs for PE and DVT. Compared with before vaccination, the hazard of any venous thrombosis was lower 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S in people aged ≥70 (aHR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.63) and 1 to 28 days after BNT162b2 (<70: HR 0.81, 0.74 to 0.88; ≥70 HR: 0.57, 0.53 to 0.62), with similar aHRs for PE and DVT. (Fig 1, Tables 4 and 5).

In people aged <70 years, aHRs for ICVT were 2.27 (95% CI: 1.32 to 3.88) 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S and 0.59 (0.24 to 1.45) 1 to 28 days after BNT162b2 compared with before vaccination. HRs were similar in men and women (Fig 1, Tables 4 and 5). In a post hoc analyses, in people aged <40 years, the aHRs for ICVT 1 to 28 days after vaccination were 3.73 (1.58 to 8.83) and 1.07 (0.33 to 3.48) for ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2, respectively, compared with before vaccination. The same estimates for people 40 to 69 years were 1.93 (1.19 to 2.13) and 0.74 (0.29 to 1.87). In people aged ≥70 years, associations of vaccination with ICVT were estimated imprecisely (<10 events for ChAdOx1-S and 8 for BNT162b2).

aHRs for any arterial thrombosis 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95) and 0.76 (0.73 to 0.79) in people aged <70 and ≥70 years, respectively, compared with before vaccination. Corresponding aHRs 1 to 28 days after BNT162b2 were 0.94 (0.90 to 0.99) and 0.72 (0.70 to 0.75). HRs were similar for MI and ischaemic stroke, and >28 days after vaccination (Fig 2, Tables 4 and 5).

In people aged <70 years, aHRs for thrombocytopenia were 1.71 (95% CI:1.35 to 2.16) 1 to 28 days and 1.69 (1.16 to 2.46) >28 days after ChAdOx1-S compared with before vaccination. Corresponding HRs after BNT162b2 were 1.00 (0.75 to 1.34) and 0.97 (0.66 to 1.41). For those aged ≥70 years, aHRs for thrombocytopenia 1 to 28 days after vaccination were similar for ChAdOx1 (0.79, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.10) and BNT162b2 (0.68, 0.51 to 0.90) (Fig 3, Tables 4 and 5).

aHRs for the control condition lower limb fracture 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.93), and 0.83 (0.78 to 0.89) in people aged <70 and ≥70 years, respectively, compared with before vaccination. Corresponding aHRs after BNT162b2 were 0.93 (0.84 to 1.02) and 0.69 (0.66 to 0.73). (Fig 3, Tables 4 and 5). aHRs for all-cause mortality 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S were 0.37 (95% CI: 0.35 to 0.39), and 0.28 (0.28 to 0.29) in people aged <70 and ≥70 years, respectively. Corresponding aHRs after BNT162b2 were 0.24 (0.22 to 0.26) and 0.19 (0.19 to 0.20) (S2 Fig, Tables 4 and 5).

Subgroup analyses

aHRs for all venous and for all arterial thrombotic events 1 to 28 days after vaccination compared with before vaccination were lower in older age groups for each vaccine (all interaction p-values <0.001) (S2 Table). HRs for venous thromboses were >1 1 to 28 days after compared with before vaccination in people aged <50 years for ChAdOx1-S but not BNT162b2. aHRs for arterial thromboses were >1 1 to 28 days after compared with before vaccination in people aged <50 years for both ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2. Less marked trends for lower HRs in older individuals were observed for HRs >28 days after vaccination. A higher proportion of venous thromboses in those aged <40 years (7%) compared with those aged ≥40 years were due to ICVT (40 to 59: 1.6%, 60 to 69: 0.9%, and 70+: 0.5%). A higher proportion of arterial thromboses at age <40 (49%) was due to stroke than at ages 40 to 59 (40%) and 60 to 69 (44%) years.

Despite modest differences between the magnitude of HRs in subgroups defined by sex, ethnicity, prior COVID, COCP, diabetes, deprivation or history of MI, DVT, or PE, anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication, aHRs in all of these subgroups were consistent with lower rates of arterial or venous thromboses after vaccination with ChAdOx1-S or BNT162b2 (S2 Table).

Sensitivity analyses

When using a less restrictive outcome definition (outcomes recorded as primary or secondary reason for admission or death), aHRs were consistent with those from analyses of outcomes in the primary position (S3 Fig). Similarly, aHRs for fatal outcomes were similar to HRs for fatal or nonfatal outcomes (S4 Fig). There were very few people for whom outcomes in the primary position were recorded as well as thrombocytopenia in any position in the same hospital admission or death record (after ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b, respectively: ICVT 7 and 0; all arterial thromboses 47 and 58; all venous thromboses 37 and 26).


In this cohort study, which included almost all adults alive in England at the start of the national COVID-19 vaccination programme, vaccination with ChAdOx1-S, but not BNT162b2, was associated with approximately 2-fold higher rates of ICVT or hospitalisations due to thrombocytopenia in people aged under 70 years, after adjusting for a comprehensive range of demographic characteristics and comorbidities. The corresponding absolute increases in the risk of these events were very small. ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 were associated with lower hazards of major vascular events after vaccination in those aged ≥70 years. Post hoc analyses stratified by age suggest that in people aged <50 years, rates of venous thromboses were higher 1 to 28 days after vaccination with ChAdOx1-S, and that rates of arterial thrombotic events were higher 1 to 28 days after vaccination with ChAdOx1-S or BNT162b2, compared with rates in unvaccinated people.

The large population analysed adds substantial precision to estimated associations of thromboses with vaccination, which is of particular importance for very rare events and associations in subgroups. The extensive data linkages across different healthcare settings enabled adjustment for a wide range of confounding variables. The analysed population is slightly larger than the midyear estimate of the 2020 English population aged ≥18 (44,456,850) that excluded short-term residents and students, and modelled international migrant numbers [12].

Our findings are generally consistent with other studies. Smaller Danish and Norwegian electronic health record studies reported a small excess of intracranial haemorrhage (2 per 100,000 1 to 28 days after ChAdOx1-S), cerebral venous thrombosis (3 per 100,000), and other venous thrombosis (2 per 100,000) [13]. The randomised trials of ChAdOx1-S reported no venous thrombotic events among 8,597 participants who received the vaccine versus 2 among 8,581who received placebo [14]. A Scottish study found a risk of 1.13 (0.62 to 1.63) cases of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura per 100,000 after ChAdOx1-S. There was no clear evidence on other outcomes, although the number of postvaccine events was small [15]. A study with English vaccine data linked to other health records used a self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis and found higher incidence rates following ChAdOx1 of: thrombocytopenia 8 to 14 days and 22 to 28 days postvaccine; of all venous thromboembolism 8 to 14 days postvaccine; and ICVT 8 to 14 days postvaccine (incidence rate ratio 4.01, 95% CI: 2.08 to 7.71); and following BNT162b2 of ICVT 15 to 21 days postvaccine (3.58, 1.39 to 9.27) and of ischaemic stroke 15 to 21 days postvaccine (1.12, 1.04 to 1.20) [16]. We did not find evidence of higher rates of any event in the whole population following BNT162b2. Differences between the results of this SCCS study and our findings may have arisen due to the following: differences in outcome data sources and definitions; inclusion in the SCCS study of outcomes recorded after the potential association of unusual thromboses and thrombocytopenia with COVID-19 vaccination was widely known, introducing possible diagnostic bias; and censoring by death in the SCCS study, a known limitation of the SCCS design for potentially fatal outcomes. Reporting of ICVT cases to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) identified more cases of ICVT with thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1-S than the present study (44 up to 31 March 2021) [17].

Healthcare systems planning to use ChAdOx1-S should balance the very small harms against the known benefits of the vaccine. For older populations, who are most vulnerable to COVID-19, we found no evidence of increased risk of any event with ChAdOx1-S. In younger populations, who have a lower morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19, other available vaccines might be prioritised, especially when the risk of COVID-19 is otherwise low.

Our study has several limitations. First, identification of exposures, covariates, and outcomes relies on the accuracy of data collected during routine healthcare. Additional data on results of laboratory and radiology investigations would have improved diagnostic coding, particularly for ascertainment of thrombocytopenia. Second, people who were not registered with an NHS GP (for example, the homeless, recent immigrants, those using only private healthcare, and those not eligible for NHS care) or who opted out of their data being provided to NHS Digital were excluded. Third, follow-up ended on 18 March 2021, but a small number of events that occurred before this date may have been excluded because they had yet to be coded or the people affected were still in hospital. Analyses after this date will likely lead to overestimation of associations, because speciality societies recommended further investigations of mild symptoms in vaccinated populations. Fourth, our primary outcome used the primary reason for death or hospital admission, which improves the positive predictive value but may lead to an underestimation of incidence. We believe this is necessary because historical nonincident events are frequently recorded in secondary positions. Analyses of events recorded in any position as fatal within 28 days were consistent with the primary analyses. Fifth, we did not address time-varying confounding, which can occur when factors, which vary during follow-up, such as admission to hospital, predict both vaccination and outcomes of interest. Sixth, comparison of adjusted and unadjusted associations suggests that studies that do not adjust for a comprehensive range of potential confounders will overestimate the thrombotic effects of vaccination. However, adjusted associations in this study may still be biased by unmeasured confounding by patient characteristics that predict both vaccination and thromboses and that are difficult to ascertain in electronic health records. Examples include general health at the time of vaccination, and people at higher risk of thromboses (for example, with end-stage diseases) [18]. There were slightly lower postvaccination rates of the “negative control” outcome lower limb fracture in those aged ≥70 years, which are likely due to unmeasured confounding. This implies that inverse associations of vaccination with thrombotic outcomes in that age group may also be attributable in part to unmeasured confounding.

Associations of vaccination with thromboses varied with age. This may be because in older people, small increases in the risk of major thrombotic events after vaccination with ChAdOx1-S were more than offset by reductions in major thrombotic events (particularly PE) subsequent to COVID-19. By contrast, in younger people, any increase in risk associated with ChAdOx1-S vaccine is less likely to be offset by a lower risk of COVID-associated thrombosis, because the chance of severe COVID disease is lower in younger than older individuals.

Further analyses assessing the effects of other vaccines and the effects of second doses of these vaccines on thrombotic, neurological, and cardiac complications will be important to inform vaccination programmes. Access to data from radiology or laboratory systems (which in the UK will rely on regional rather than national data collection systems) will allow more comprehensive case ascertainment and more granular phenotyping. Such efforts are currently underway across the UK.

In summary, in this study, we observed increases in rates of ICVT and thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1-S vaccination in adults aged <70 years that were small compared with its previously reported effect in reducing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, although more precise estimates for adults <40 years are needed. For people aged ≥70 years, rates of arterial or venous thrombotic events were generally lower after either vaccine.


  1. 1.
    Schultz NH, Sørvoll IH, Michelsen AE, Munthe LA, Lund-Johansen F, Ahlen MT, et al. Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021. pmid:33835768
  2. 2.
    Greinacher A, Thiele T, Warkentin TE, Weisser K, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021. pmid:33835769
  3. 3.
    Scully M, Singh D, Lown R, Poles A, Solomon T, Levi M, et al. Pathologic Antibodies to Platelet Factor 4 after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021. pmid:33861525
  4. 4.
    Blauenfeldt RA, Kristensen SR, Ernstsen SL, Kristensen CCH, Simonsen CZ, Hvas A-M. Thrombocytopenia with acute ischemic stroke and bleeding in a patient newly vaccinated with an adenoviral vector-based COVID-19 vaccine. J Thromb Haemost. 2021. pmid:33877737
  5. 5.
    Wood A, Denholm R, Hollings S, Cooper J, Ip S, Walker V, et al. Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: Data resource. BMJ. 2021;373. pmid:33827854
  6. 6.
    BHF Data Science Centre. Study protocol. 2021. Available from: vaccination and risk of arterial and venous event BHF DSC v1.2.pdf
  7. 7.
    Trusted research environment. [cited 2021 Oct 5]. Available from:
  8. 8.
    Herrett E, Shah AD, Boggon R, Denaxas S, Smeeth L, van Staa T, et al. Completeness and diagnostic validity of recording acute myocardial infarction events in primary care, hospital care, disease registry, and national mortality records: cohort study. BMJ. 2013;346:f2350. pmid:23692896
  9. 9.
    COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca: PRAC investigating cases of thromboembolic events—vaccine’s benefits currently still outweigh risks—Update | European Medicines Agency. [cited 2021 May 10]. Available from:
  10. 10.
    Dickerman BA, García-Albéniz X, Logan RW, Denaxas S, Hernán MA. Avoidable flaws in observational analyses: an application to statins and cancer. Nat Med. 2019;25:1601–06. pmid:31591592
  11. 11.
    Dickerman BA, García-Albéniz X, Logan RW, Denaxas S, Hernán MA. Emulating a target trial in case-control designs: an application to statins and colorectal cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49:1637–46. pmid:32989456
  12. 12.
    Office for National Statistics. Estimates of the population for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 5]. Available from:
  13. 13.
    Pottegård A, Lund LC, Karlstad Ø, Dahl J, Andersen M, Hallas J, et al. Arterial events, venous thromboembolism, thrombocytopenia, and bleeding after vaccination with Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S in Denmark and Norway: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2021;373:n1114. pmid:33952445
  14. 14.
    Voysey M, Costa Clemens SA, Madhi SA, Weckx LY, Folegatti PM, Aley PK, et al. Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials. Lancet. 2021;397:881–91. pmid:33617777
  15. 15.
    Simpson CR, Shi T, Vasileiou E, Katikireddi S V, Kerr S, Moore E, et al. First-dose ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines and thrombocytopenic, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events in Scotland. Nat Med. 2021. pmid:34108714
  16. 16.
    Hippisley-Cox J, Patone M, Mei XW, Saatci D, Dixon S, Khunti K, et al. Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study. BMJ. 2021;374:n1931. pmid:34446426
  17. 17.
    Hunter PR. Thrombosis after covid-19 vaccination. BMJ. 2021;373. pmid:33853865
  18. 18.
    Curtis HJ, Inglesby P, Morton CE, MacKenna B, Green A, Hulme W, et al. Trends and clinical characteristics of 57.9 million COVID-19 vaccine recipients: a federated analysis of patients’ primary care records in situ using OpenSAFELY. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;BJGP.2021.0376. pmid:34750106