EHEALTH Inform: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Buyers that a Class Motion Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against eHealth, Inc. and Encourages Buyers to Speak to the Business

NEW YORK–(Business WIRE)–Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally acknowledged stockholder legal rights legislation agency, reminds buyers that a class action lawsuit has been filed in opposition to eHealth, Inc. (“eHealth” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: EHTH) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of all people and entities who acquired or usually acquired eHealth securities among April 26, 2018 and July 23, 2020, the two dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Buyers have right until March 18, 2022 to apply to the Court to be appointed as direct plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Click here to take part in the action.

eHealth is a wellness insurance policy broker that focuses on providing Medicare-related insurance policies on behalf of personal insurers. Its key source of profits is commissions from advertising Medicare Benefit, Medicare Supplement, and Medicare Aspect D prescription drug policies. On January 1, 2018, eHealth adopted and carried out a new accounting common for recognizing profits. This conventional, referred to herein as Accounting Typical Codification 606 or ASC 606, authorized eHealth to figure out quickly the entirety of the commissions it expected to obtain above the expected lifetime of the guidelines. Though eHealth offered yearly insurance policies that could be cancelled at any time by the client, it assumed that its policies would be renewed for numerous years. As a result, for lots of of eHealth’s Medicare-related policies, it identified in between a few and five a long time of commissions immediately upon the sale of the plan.

The Complaint in the Class Motion alleges that the assumption that eHealth’s buyers would renew its insurance policies was unrealistic and contrary to eHealth’s the latest knowledge of both of those cancellations and renewals. Starting in 2017, eHealth commenced soliciting Medicare buyers with television advertising and marketing. Late-evening commercials boasting $ regular monthly plan rates proficiently generated a surge in clients in a quick period of time. Between 2017 and 2018, the number of Medicare-related insurance apps submitted to eHealth by applicants grew by 39%. These clients, nonetheless, were notorious for cancelling their policies in shorter intervals of time, resulting in eHealth to working experience sky-rocketing “member churn” ratios, i.e., the percentage of consumers who terminate their policies within the initial yr. Notwithstanding, eHealth was equipped to present analysts and investors with record-environment earnings due to the fact that it was in a position to figure out 3- to five-yrs of fee income for these guidelines upfront and straight away.

The Criticism more alleges that Course users have been materially harmed by eHealth’s wrong and deceptive statements. As a immediate outcome of Defendants’ materially fake and misleading statements, eHealth’s stock value artificially amplified from a relative constant cost of about $15.32 for each share of popular stock on March 19, 2018 to $136.32 prior to April 8, 2020. It was on that day that Muddy Waters Cash, a very well-recognized and very highly regarded investigate firm, released a report revealing eHealth’s accounting misconduct. The report disclosed, among other points, that eHealth’s “highly intense accounting masks a noticeably unprofitable business enterprise,” “that the crucial driver of expansion considering that 2018 has been EHTH’s reliance on Direct Reaction television promotion, which draws in an unprofitable, substantial churn enrollee,” “that EHTH’s persistence assumptions in its LTV product [under ASC 606] seem remarkably intense when compared to truth.” Muddy Waters report also disclosed that eHealth’s financial statements for 2019: (a) overstated revenue by $128 million (b) overstated running earnings by $263 million and (c) understated an functioning reduction of -$181 million. The Muddy Waters report resulted in a sharp decline in the rate of eHealth’s stock, plummeting to $103.20 for each share.

Subsequently, on July 23, 2020, when eHealth declared its earnings success for the 2nd quarter of fiscal 2020, its inventory rate fell all over again as the details contained in its announcement confirmed substantive aspects of the “member churn” allegations previously asserted in the Muddy Waters report. In reaction, eHealth’s inventory cost declined from a closing cost of $114 for every share on July 23, 2020 to $79.17 for each share on July 24, 2020.

If you acquired or otherwise obtained eHealth shares and suffered a loss, are a long-expression stockholder, have facts, would like to discover additional about these claims, or have any thoughts concerning this announcement or your rights or pursuits with regard to these matters, make sure you get in touch with Brandon Walker or Alexandra Raymond by electronic mail at [email protected], phone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this get hold of form. There is no price tag or obligation to you.

About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally identified regulation organization with workplaces in New York, California, and South Carolina. The business represents specific and institutional buyers in commercial, securities, by-product, and other complicated litigation in state and federal courts across the state. For additional information and facts about the company, remember to take a look at www.bespc.com. Lawyer advertising and marketing. Prior effects do not ensure similar results.